Not All Agree With the ‘Essential Driver Training’ Programme
Not too many will remember a little shimmozle at the Custom House on the 26th of October this year when there were a few verbals showered in the direction of no less gentlemen than Leo Varadkar, Transport Minister, the Garda Commissioner, Martin Callinan and the RSA CEO, Noel Brett. Well then, the short-lived drama was over as quickly as it started. It made an appearance on that evening’s RTE News at Six and it must have alerted some of the aforementioned people.
The protagonists were ADIs (Approved Driving Instructors) and members of the GMB Union. The numbers totalled about 70, led by Eamonn Coy. The GMB appears an unusual Union for some ofour driving instructors to join. This Union is known as the National Union of General and Municipal Workers and was founded in 1924 in England and has a membership there of .6 million. In Ireland, it is based in Hollywood, Co. Down and represents its driving instructor members throughout the whole country. Coy is actively recruiting new members. I understand that membership is c.35eur annually.
Noel Brett refuses to meet Coy’s Union – it sounds or maybe rhymes a little like a Col. Eamon of 1930s fame! Apparently, Brett doesn’t see this Union to be an appropriate representative of its ADI members. The RTE snap shot mentioned above was certainly not a good advertisement for the Union as far as I observed. It was a very crude attempt in an effort to draw the attention of the RSA hierarchy and the public to their grievances.
In widely sent emails afterwards, Coy states that his Union and ADIs are a professional body aimed at bringing about necessary and responsible change to the current EDT, or driver training programme as set out by the RSA. He also thanks those who engaged in the protest saying they conducted themselves in a very professional manner!
Those little undercurrents flow unknown to the learner driver which is probably for the better. Their job is to learn to be a competent driver with a good attitude to safety and all other drivers out there. So what is Eamonn Coy concerned with?
There was no standard set down by the State for driving tests until 2007, yet the Irish Driving Instructors Association (IDIA) existed for decades preparing students for the Test. This Association was not recognised by the State as a legal setup, though its standard was the only one in existence and it was allowed to operate without official communication, advice or recognition. It was an unusual situation to have been allowed. Really it was a cry to the Government who were surely careless when, having set up the Driving Test system, they did not allow for a training standard either in written or practical form.
Then in 2006/7 the Road Safety Authority came into being with the new formula for the driving test being made official in writ and instruction method. Stringent exams had to be passed by the new instructors. Those who were in the trade, many for a lifetime, had not their experience or professionalism taken into consideration. Neither were they consulted on the new system that was manifesting. They expressed their opposition, to no avail.
Then in April this year those who did not have a Licence or Learner Permit had to undergo the EDT programme which entailed 12 compulsory lessons conducted by an approved driving instructor. It was the syllabus as drawn up by the RSA that has irked Eamonn Coy and indeed many many driving instructors not linked to Eamonn. There are a few gripes. The main one is the role of the Sponsor whose input is in supervising the learner between lessons with the instructor. This ‘sponsor’ is usually a parent or other family member or friend who will do ongoing practice sessions with the learner in consultation with the instructor. Questions being asked by the ‘Coy brigade’ range as follows:
*A sponsor is not a trained instructor, therefore should not be allowed play such official role.
*A sponsor may easily give incorrect instruction, or that contradicting the instructor, thus frustrating and confusing the learner.
*Who is legally responsible should there be a collision when the sponsor is practising with the learner, as advised by the instructor.
*Where family members are involved in such instruction/practice, it is too often dominated by disagreement/argument.
*The ADI has a dual controlled vehicle whereas the sponsor has no control over a car should an emergency arise.
*Lesson No. 2 moves too quickly and, among others, includes the following actions – cornering, negotiating junctions, changing lanes, entering and exiting roundabouts, correct position in traffic lanes.
One might easily conclude that it takes a good driver to manage such manoeuvres. Coy surely has a point, yet I find that it is the availability of the dual control system to the ADI that enables him to undertake such tasks.
Noel Brett has intimated that the EDT programme may be up for review within eighteen months to two years of implementation. Meanwhile, I doubt if the Coy corner will throw a white towel.