Is the Driving Test Adequate?
You may have seen my piece on the proposed graduated driving licence (GDL) where, for the younger drivers, supervision will be a must, zero alcohol levels, one passenger only, night curfew, two driving tests, accelerated penalty points etc etc. Does all that go far enough?
The greatest criticism I find with the current system here and even that of the GDL is that a 17 year old can acquire a Learner Permit and drive on the public road. ‘L’ Plate or no ‘L’ plate, being accompanied or not, such driver makes all the big decisions when the emergency arises ( or is created) The accompanying person has no physical control of speed, position on road, slowing or stopping. The horrific crash in the USA recently in which the Irish father and mother were killed in a single vehicle collision is a case in point: press reports state their teenage daughter was driving. Only in a dual controlled vehicle has the supervisor control: yes, verbal guidance can be given by the parent and he sees to it that his teenage son is sober, drug free and he’s not plugged in to an MP3 Player; but when his three friends become his ‘supervision’ the scene changes dramatically – spoiler fitted, turbocharged engine, alloy wheels and the Ford 150 SVT Lighting, is ready to create new records. In some European countries, a driver must pass a driving test before going on the public road (except with a driving instructor.)
While compulsory driving lessons are mooted here, at present it’s irrelevant. A Road Safety Authority official stated to me recently that the standard of driving in the actual test has deteriorated because drivers are, apparently, taking fewer driving lessons and hoping to pass, instead of undergoing a proper course. Some money saved, definitely maybe or might it be throwing good money after bad? The standard of the test in Ireland is very high, its foolhardy to take the shortcut. Expensive it is, but what price a life?
A candidate who fails the test can drive home and drive on until the next test. There’s no input or report from the test centre as to the dangers of such person continuing to drive ; Gaybo is very silent on the aspect particularly.
Where an instructor spends 5, 10 or maybe more hours with a learner, s/he is in an excellent position to give an assessment of that student. In a driving test situation, the better performance isn’t always forthcoming, therefore, in many instances it wont be a true reflection of the quality of that driver. A tester observes them for a half hour. Why not then adopt a new report form detailing the strengths and weaknesses of a learner as seen by the instructor and presented to the test supervisor or the RSA.
Also, the instructor should accompany the candidate during the test.
At present a driving test involves a daytime drive through a town, maybe the outskirts of the town and partly through a housing estate. If traffic is heavy, it’s like winning a slow bicycle race.
Where does the test address the following situations?
I am not looking to make a driving test more difficult for anyone, rather to improve efficiency, alertness to danger, greater ability to deal with emergencies, ultimately preventing crashes and saving lives. So, I don’t see the test (Class B) matching the challenge that our roads present. Every change costs a little more but no change can be more costly.
Leave a Reply